Russia's Next Move in Ukraine War

Putin Holds Back? The Hidden Strategy Behind Russia's Silence After Ukraine Attacks – Trump's Bombshell NATO Comments!

 Today is Friday, June 6th, and we are discussing the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine.

You might be wondering what there is left to talk about in this conflict. Putin's power has been exposed—every few months, a small country like Ukraine launches significant attacks on Russia, yet Russia's response has been surprisingly muted. In this video, I will explain why Russia hasn’t retaliated strongly, whether there’s a strategic plan behind this, and what comments have come from Trump’s side.

Many of you comment that Russia cannot defeat America, that Russia should accept defeat against NATO, and that this war should not be prolonged before Ukraine launches an even bigger attack. Every four to six months, when Ukraine carries out such large-scale strikes, I read your reactions in the comments section of my videos.

However, just a few days ago, when Russia attacked Ukraine, many of you were calling for massive retaliation—demanding missile strikes, the destruction of NATO, and the downfall of American hegemony. You argue that if a few key nations stand against American dominance, the rest of the world, which you see as enslaved by the U.S., could break free.

Countries like Russia and China are at the forefront of challenging American global dominance. They aim to create a multipolar world where no single power dictates terms. America often uses countries like Ukraine or Taiwan as pawns. When elections don’t go their way, they orchestrate regime changes—as seen in Ukraine after 2010 when Viktor Yanukovych, a pro-Russian leader, was ousted.

Russia resisted this interference, leading to the ongoing conflict from Crimea to Donbas. Meanwhile, nations worldwide are waking up to America’s true nature. African leaders like Ibrahim Traoré are rejecting Western exploitation, and countries like Iran, despite sanctions, find support in Russia and China.

The West labels certain leaders as "bad guys," but many people stand with them because these so-called "bad guys" are fighting for a fairer world—one where international institutions aren’t controlled by America, where regimes aren’t toppled at will, and where sanctions aren’t weaponized.

With the current U.S. administration’s chaotic leadership, the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) see an opportunity to accelerate their vision of a multipolar world. Donald Trump’s treatment of NATO allies has been particularly telling. During a recent NATO summit, his Defense Secretary, Lloyd Austin, spoke to other members as if they were subordinates.

Putin is sending a message to Europe: if they continue serving American interests, they must reconsider their future. European nations, despite being NATO members, are increasingly opposing U.S. policies—especially regarding Israel. For the first time, Europe is pushing back against American directives, partly because Trump’s transactional approach ignores the Pentagon’s traditional strategies.

When German Chancellor Olaf Scholz visited the White House, Europe was stunned by Trump’s remarks comparing the Russia-Ukraine war to a street fight between children. He suggested that instead of intervening, it’s better to let them tire themselves out.

This analogy shocked European leaders who have invested billions in Ukraine, only to face economic strain and the threat of a larger war. Meanwhile, Trump’s focus on NATO members increasing defense spending to 5% of GDP further strains the alliance.

When asked about Ukraine’s recent attacks and Russia’s potential retaliation, Trump hinted that Russia might seize all of Ukraine. Reports suggest Russia is preparing a significant response, possibly involving missile strikes, drone attacks, or even expanding territorial control with support from North Korea and Chechen fighters.

Ukraine’s president has urgently requested more air defense systems and arms, calling for a ceasefire. However, Putin has made it clear that peace talks will only happen if NATO’s expansionist policies and regime-change tactics are addressed.

Russia’s strategy isn’t just about military strikes—it’s about dismantling American hegemony diplomatically and economically. European nations, realizing the futility of prolonged conflict, may eventually accept Russia’s terms.

What are your thoughts? Share in the comments. Until next time